Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Captain Of Success
Top Stories

Stock Markets

Probe ordered into procurement of agri machinery, inputs

PHILSTAR FILE PHOTO

THE Department of Agriculture (DA) said it ordered an investigation into the procurement of farm equipment and inputs meant for distribution to farmers, following allegations of irregularities by farmers’ groups.

“We invite these farmers’ groups and other organizations to help us ferret out the corrupt within our midst. We cannot allow these taxpayers’ funds to be squandered,” Agriculture Secretary Francisco P. Tiu Laurel, Jr. was quoted as saying in a statement.

He also directed the DA’s legal team to look into reported delays in fertilizer deliveries, warning that suppliers who fail to meet contractual obligations could face penalties or blacklisting.

The DA added that the Philippine Center for Postharvest Development and Mechanization (PhilMech) rejected claims that it conducted only token consultations with farmer beneficiaries, saying all procurement exercises undergo competitive public bidding in accordance with government procurement and auditing rules.

PhilMech, which managed about P5 billion annually for machinery and postharvest facilities over the past six years from the Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund, said it sources equipment from multiple qualified suppliers to ensure quality and suitability for diverse farming conditions.

Farmer organizations made the allegations on Wednesday, citing issues with procurement and distribution of farm inputs and equipment meant to be released to farmers at subsidized rates.

In a joint statement, the Federation of Free Farmers (FFF) and MAGSASAKA Party-List (MPL) urged Mr. Laurel to act on “persistent, disturbing reports” involving the procurement of seed, fertilizer, machinery, and other items.

According to the statement, FFF Chairman Leonardo Q. Montemayor and MPL President Argel Joseph T. Cabatbat told Mr. Laurel in a letter that the procurement process had become politicized despite the safeguard of formal bidding procedures.

“While (on paper) bidding and awards are done at the regional or agency level, it is said that the outcomes are being effectively determined by a few high-ranking DA officials and their political backers who control the funding decisions,” they said in a statement.

They claimed technical specifications in bid documents were allegedly tailored to favor selected suppliers, discouraging competition.

The FFF and MPL said they received reports from beneficiaries about substandard inputs and equipment, including low-germination seed, incorrect fertilizer types, and poorly-performing machinery with limited after-sales support.

They also alleged that some rice mills and processing facilities funded by government programs have become underutilized due to a lack of operating capital or management capacity among the recipients.

Meanwhile, the DA said it will pilot a new procurement system for inorganic fertilizer this year, allowing farmers to purchase eligible products directly using their Intervention Monitoring Card or an IMC-linked e-wallet, to streamline subsidy delivery and reduce leakages. — Vonn Andrei E. Villamiel

    You May Also Like

    Stock Markets

    SEC studies lifting moratorium on new online lending platforms – BusinessWorld Online                                    ...

    Stock Markets

    Visitors browse locally made products on display at a trade fair in Mandaluyong City, Oct. 26, 2025. — PHILIPPINE STAR/NOEL B. PABALATE By Aubrey...

    Finance

    Steven Bartlett, the millionaire entrepreneur and Dragons’ Den investor, is facing mounting criticism from celebrities and content creators after comments made on his podcast,...

    Finance

    In London’s business districts, work still unfolds around desks, deadlines, doctors operating rooms and long stretches of sitting broken only by meetings and commutes....

    Disclaimer: CaptainOfSuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice.
    The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.