Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Captain Of Success
Top Stories

Stock Markets

Orica loses bid for P25.78-M VAT refund

CTA.JUDICIARY.GOV.PH

THE Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) en banc has affirmed the denial of Orica Philippines, Inc.’s bid to recover P25.78 million in alleged excess or unutilized input value-added tax (VAT) for the fourth quarter of 2016, ruling that the chemical firm’s judicial claim was filed beyond the prescribed period.

A decision, promulgated last Oct. 1 by Associate Justice Corazon G. Ferrer-Flores, upheld the December 2023 ruling and the May 2024 resolution of the CTA Special First Division, which dismissed Orica’s claim for lack of jurisdiction.

Orica, a domestic corporation with principal offices at Rockwell Business Center in Pasig City, filed the petition for review before the tax court on June 14, 2024, challenging the denial of its VAT refund application by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR).

The initial refund request was submitted to the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) on Sept. 25, 2018, covering the period from July 1 to Sept. 30, 2016.

The company argued that its judicial claim for refund was filed within the prescriptive period under Section 112(C) of the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC) of 1997, as amended by the Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion (TRAIN) Law. Orica contended that the CIR’s partial denial on Jan. 16, 2019, came after the 90 days mandated by law for the BIR to act on refund applications.

However, the tax court ruled that the appeal was filed out of time, citing provisions under Republic Act (RA) No. 1125, as amended by RA No. 9282, which give the CTA jurisdiction over tax refund cases only if appeals are filed within the prescribed period following the BIR’s action or inaction.

“The petition for review filed on Feb. 15, 2019, was beyond the 30-day period allowed for judicial claims,” the Court said. “There being no reversible error committed by the Court in Division, the CTA en banc finds no cogent reason to reverse and set aside the assailed resolution.”

In a dissenting opinion, Presiding Justice Roman G. Del Rosario argued that the judicial claim for refund was filed within the 30-day period following the CIR’s decision denying the administrative claim, which was received by Orica on Jan. 16, 2019.

As the en banc majority denied the petition, Orica will not recover the total of P25.7 million in excess input VAT, leaving the case closed unless new legal measures are taken. — Erika Mae P. Sinaking

    You May Also Like

    Stock Markets

    Pedestrians along the Estrella-Pantaleon Bridge are dwarfed by the towering buildings in Makati City, Dec. 5, 2022. — PHILIPPINE STAR/MIGUEL DE GUZMAN THE Department...

    Stock Markets

    The logo of J.P. Morgan is seen in Zurich, Switzerland July 8, 2021. — REUTERS/ARND WIEGMANN By Bettina Faye V. Roc, Banking Editor THE...

    Finance

    A new player in football talent management has entered the game. M+C Saatchi Football, co-founded by former England and Liverpool midfielder Jamie Redknapp, officially...

    Finance

    Tesla shares have surged almost 50% since the company was rocked by a very public clash between CEO Elon Musk and US President Donald...

    Disclaimer: CaptainOfSuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice.
    The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.